Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTeen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CTeen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon for this organization to have an article. There is no notability, no awards, no dedicated discussion in secondary sources. Binksternet (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is an advertisement only. If it isn't deleted, it should be blanked and rewritten from scratch with sources. For one thing, it is largely a copyvio from here. Zero^talk 04:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Not the right place to start anyway, if this grows.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guide me as to why this should be deleted?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.147.50 (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So far the argument is that the organization is not notable enough. The article also violates the organization's copyright (and no, it's not simple to transfer that copyright). Wikipedia is not a place to promote an organization, nor is it a place for plain description of its activities.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. See WP:42, which talks about notability. Dear article creator: May I suggest you focus on creating a good website for CTeen, and shouldn't write a Wikipedia article; instead, wait for someone unaffiliated with CTeen to write such article. All the best, —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.