Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can you handle mine?
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you handle mine? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Album doesn't exist, so I don't quite see how it could be notable enough for its own entry. Prod declined without changes, also nominated for A9, but A9 doesn't apply. Hairhorn (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article says there was a "re-release in 2006" but then says it was never released. Kind of confusing, but from a little research I'm getting it wasn't released. At any rate, the coverage looks pretty slim. Jujutacular T · C 19:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular T · C 19:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's a non-existent album. -- Whpq (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete uncited speculation MrMarmite (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.