Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie Turner
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Home and Away characters. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cassie Turner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with no assertion of much of anything. delete. Jack Merridew 08:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Merge to an appropriate list (there seem to be a few for this show) and delete. Non-notable fictional character. florrie 15:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my nomination statement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Austin Matthewedwards : Chat 16:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Minor character; no real-world significance. –Moondyne 03:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- merge Minor character. Presumably should be mentioned on a list about the individual. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- merge not appropriate for a separate article, but probably for a merge, and certainly at least for a redirect. No argument has been given against redirect, probably because there is no coherent argument. DGG (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.