Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle thunder (sound effect)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castle thunder (sound effect)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sourcing found. Sources in article are a video and a personal website. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sources added; appears that sufficient coverage exists to satisfy WP:GNG. Gongshow talk 07:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above; reliable sources have been found and incorporated into the article. Due to the pages' size, however, I would not be against merging the links in Template:Stock sound effects into one article, but all of their content must be kept. Modernponderer (talk) 14:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as my nom.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.