Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Ball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus on whether the references are in-depth enough or that she meets WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Ball

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not finding enough coverage to qualify Dr Ball as notable under WP:BIO. Tacyarg (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've found several reliable, substantial newspaper articles (via ProQuest) including references to Ball as "a global authority on drones". Article's length seem appropriate; it doesn't feel overly promotional (although the edit history does). I will look to adding some references and then the page should be reconsidered. Cabrils (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is plenty of coverage - I have added three more references, and there are more that could be added, with more information about her career too. Definitely meets WP:BASIC. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This subject does not meet WP:GNG. The article is definitely in violation of WP:NPROMO so at least we need to clean it up. Skirts89 (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per RebeccaGreen's !vote above. XOR'easter (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The documentation shows only such not notable awards as "Queensland Business Woman of the Year ", which are entirely promotional. . DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There are definitely some reliable non trivial references available, but not a lot or sustained that I can see, but there is just enough to get the subject over the GNG line I think. (If the subject was a male association football player this would be speedy keep!) Aoziwe (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.