Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CavinKare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CavinKare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly primary sourced, for years. I wonder if this is not just plain promotion. Suggest to delete, or draftify if someone feels it can be rewritten. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, completely promotional and fails WP:SPIP. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
THere's a lot written about this company, and I'm quite sure it'd pass our notability guidelines. However, I'll refrain from opining keep until I manage to clean up the article and add the references in there. —SpacemanSpiff 07:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on probably passing WP:NCORP if refs like this and this are considered reliable. Basie (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Neither of those references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The TheHindu.com reference is based on a company announcement and fails WP:ORGIND. The TimesOfIndia reference has not attributed journalist and the information is either attributed to anonymous sources (it says "people directly aware of the matter said") or based on an announcement from ChrysCapital (a connected party). It therefore fails as a reliable source in the first instance, and fails WP:ORGIND in the second. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:NCORP; just a directory listing. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with above, fails the criteria for notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Citations are from reliable sources but nothing other than those which passes WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mia Watson (talk • contribs) 17:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.