Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Tribal and Customary Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 03:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Centre for Tribal and Customary Law

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and specifically no WP:ORGDEPTH, all sources routine anouncements of course introductions or the opening of the centre. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES does not apply since this is not an "independently accredited degree-awarding institution", it is a non independent constituent center of Central University of Jharkhand. As such, notability must be established like any other organization. Note that the center isn't even independent enough to have their own website, nor even a section on the parent institute website. I would have proposed a merge, but frankly there isn't anything worthwhile to merge, so at most a redirect (which I already boldly attempted but was reverted, hence AfD). Muhandes (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per above and copyvio. Much is a direct copy of http://www.cuj.ac.in/downloads/Centre%20for%20Tribal-Info.pdf and although attempts a

to clean up the content were made the changes were reverted without comment.PRehse (talk) 04:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is no evidence that either the body of law or the center are notable. Bearian (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The body of Customary Law is notable. so is Tribal Law. (there are of course numerous types of each, a specific variety may not be notable.) This article is not concerned with either. The nominator states this is a satellite campus of an accredited university. The relevant notability guideline is WP:GNG. Neither WP:NORG or WP:ORGDEPTH are relevant, nor as the nominator states, is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. --Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 11:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. it's not a satellite campus, but a department within a university--located, a//c the article, on the main campus. We very rarely keep these without very strong references, which are not present here. DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails the GNG, i even tried alternative spellings. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.