Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified Information Systems Security Professional

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certified Information Systems Security Professional

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is just an advert for a certification. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It doesn't read like an advert to me - although it's very difficult to write an article describing an organisation or product without somebody thinking that it's actually promoting the organisation/product. Should anybody think that bits of the text are spammy, a better solution is to fix those bits of text. The subject's notability is beyond reproach - plenty of coverage by independent sources &c. bobrayner (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I also think we should keep this, contains usefull information about the certification, perhaps to round out the article a section can be included of "similar certifications" so that it doesn't come off as an advertisement. ichart 11:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be a notable certification, there are reliable sources that could help broaden the article: [1][2]. If there's a consensus that it is too promotional now, we could always stub it and rebuild from scratch. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another "I don't personally know this, therefore it must be unimportant"-nomination. And of course asking submitters to actually research the topics they're nominating for deletion would be too much to ask. Dunning-Kruger in full effect! 31.16.112.242 (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I believe all inaccurate information should be removed. But, my school offers this certification so it is a real certification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brickjenks100 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.