Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cetan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cetan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Čhetáŋ" (not or Cetan) is the Lakota word for hawk, and though I don't doubt the existence of a hawk spirit of some kind in Lokota mythology, I can't find any evidence that this one is notable. Unsourced since 2002 (!). List of Lakota deities, where Cetan is listed, could be a redirect target, but I don't see much use in redirecting without at least one reliable source confirming this spirit's existence. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I agree it doesn't deserve it's own Wikipedia article. I'll go through and add professional sources to the Lakota deities list and remove the ones that I can't find any information on in my vast library on the topic. By the way, there's different orthographies for Lakota and Cetan is correct in a few of them. The other version you stated as correct is just another orthography presented by the Lakota Language Consortium which is owned and operated by Europeans. oncamera (talk page) 15:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Oncamera: thank you for your insight on the orthography, I've updated my nomination statement accordingly :) Lennart97 (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems more like a wiktionary entry and is uncited. Yuchitown (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Yuchitown
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.