Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Wyrick
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chad Wyrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains(talk) 00:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails wP:GNG (no post-high school SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources), WP:NGRIDIRON (no pro play), and WP:NCOLLATH (no major awards, records). Note that the article was also created by a special purpose account for which the only history is creating and editing an article on this podcaster. Cbl62 (talk) 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- The best I found is hyper-local coverage of him while in high school. E.g, this and this. I discount this high school coverage per WP:NHSPHSATH. Cbl62 (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I'm unable to find the coverage necessary to pass WP:GNG or any other notability mark. The sources presented don't seem (to me) to surpass the third party standard.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.