Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandramukhi (fictional character)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Chandramukhi. I don't see a clear consensus here but I'm closing it as Redirect as I don't think it needs a third relisting. If someone feels that it's appropriate to Merge some content, feel free as long as there is attribution. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chandramukhi (fictional character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First and foremost, see Wikipedia:Notability and fiction. This page adds nothing that is not in Chandramukhi or Chandramukhi 2. Most, if not all, of this article is only about the first film. This character is not original because the first film Chandramukhi is a remake of Manichitrathazhu (1993) and Apthamitra (The 2005 Tamil film is a scene-to-scene remake of this 2004 Kannada film by the same director).

Note: This move is a direct response to the consensus at Talk:Chandramukhi_(fictional_character)#Requested move 26 August 2023. Do the originals not matter? See the awards won at Manichitrathazhu#Awards, Shobana#Awards_and_recognitions and Apthamitra#Awards.

For context, watch these two videos [1] and [2]. They came before this [3] which regards the article in question. The article was not written based on those characters since they only had one film appearance which makes me wonder why the third version/second remake version is notable. DareshMohan (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.