Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely referenced, clear COI page Holypod (talk) 02:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sufficiently referenced:excellent source for its importance, a specific statement to that effect by the standard journal in its field. More information should of course be added, but we do not delete stubs. And just what coi do I have? I do not even read it, but added it on the basis of the reference. DGG ( talk ) 23:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perhaps also as I'm happening to notice this and there's nothing outstandingly of concern. SwisterTwister talk 00:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG. The article has a clear statement of importance in a top-notch source, sufficient to support the article and to show that this is a journal that we should expect to find explained in Wikipedia.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.