Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles A. Case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles A. Case

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

declined prod. as per WP:NOTINHERITED. simply being a friend of someone notable doesn't make you notable. all I could find is 3 small mentions from gbooks but not enough to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 06:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nom, this seems unlikely to be a candidate for an encyclopedic biography. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since being Ike's friend is not grounds for having an article. Fails GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 20:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The problem here is we lack any secondary sources that consider him notable. The Eisenhower papers are in this case a primary source. If we had biographies of Eisenhower that made mentions of Case, we might well have a case that he was notable, but the papers themselves can not win the case for Case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I nearly speedied as A7 myself, nothing at all substantial. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no claim of notability and WP:A7 material. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nice piece of Kansas history and local color, but doesn't meet standard for inclusion in this encyclopeidia. Try another wiki?--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.