Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Buckmaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 23:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Buckmaster

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. No significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Below is some of the resources available. They is enough out there. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Austlit lists 18 "Works About Author" [1]

Austlit lists 17 "Works About Their Works" [2]

National Library of Australia has a collection of cuttings [3]

A little bit in the Bulletin. [4]

Dugan, Michael (1990), "Charles Buckmaster: a memoir", Overland (119): 67–73, ISSN 0030-7416

Keep - his early death, and that of michael dransfield - created a literature in itself of reflecting on short lived and precious poets of the late 1960s. Google scholar, trove, and jstor have clear evidence of this.

JarrahTree 15:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A couple of entries in Oxford Reference books: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095533602 Piecesofuk (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.