Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles de Granville
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 13:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Charles de Granville (now inc ADEX and all its sub pages of products)
[edit]Googling for "Charles de Granville" gives 287 results (on UK version atleast), with the 2nd being this article itself. I see no real claims of notability. As a side note, the person who made the article claims his version is the "Producer Version" and seems to revert any changes. Now including the company page, and all it's product sub pages as listed below. Ian¹³/t 17:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added an afd notice to: Charles de Granville, ADEX, Baron de Sigognac, Chateau de Bordeneuve, Gaston de Casteljac. Ian¹³/t 17:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all (nominator) Ian¹³/t 10:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NN Also WP:NPOV, depending how the lame edit war is going, one contributor (is he "The Producer"?) admits to running the firm's website in the discussion history. --DaveG12345 10:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "The Producer" also runs the following articles along similar adspam lines (owned by same ADEX firm):
- All (including ADEX itself) fail WP:NPOV/WP:NN, basically adverts. Delete All, if there's a chance. --DaveG12345 10:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All per nom - obvious advertising. Tevildo 11:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NN Being party #2 in the edit war - I tried to improve the article, but basically it probably just isn't worth fighting about. When I asked Olive17 if there were verifiable quotes about the product, he said no, they weren't a big enough deal for people to write about (I'm paraphrasing from memory here). I would say that maybe the French Wikipedia might want an entry on this, but not the English one.--Brianyoumans 11:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all, advertising, fails WP:NN, WP:NPOV, and WP:V. --Coredesat 20:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all AD/POV/AUTO/VANITY and hat tip to Brianyoumans for trying. ~ trialsanderrors 00:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all fails WP:everything it applies to. --Arnzy (whats up?) 01:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.