Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie and the Bhoys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie and the Bhoys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music group. Brief mentions are made in sources. Tinton5 (talk) 14:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- per significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources. I found 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, to mention few. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:20, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: meets WP:GNG, as per sources above. Esquivalience ^t 17:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG, per all the sources listed above, and the ones in the article itself. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: links from a few from loads of other wiki sites. Tommy Burns (footballer), Johnny Doyle, Willie Maley — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabthekebab (talk • contribs) 10:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment reliable sources are much better than mentions in other Wiki articles, although this article appears to have both. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.