Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaubees Ghante

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹ 19:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaubees Ghante

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability and no reliable sources. Tamravidhir (talk!) 10:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Yet another stub article sent to AFD within hours of being contributed and without tagging it for editorial concerns. Yes, pre-1990s Indian films are difficult to source but I find it difficult to conceive that a film full of award-winning Indian notables received absolutely no attention ever, even if only in pre-internet Hindi-language sources. I hope the new editor does not choose to never contribute again. We do have alternatives. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - obvious keep. Please see WP:BEFORE. many sources [1] Jethwarp (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 12:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Absolutely agree with MichaelQSchmidt here - Films before 1990s are alot harder to source so leeway is usually given on these. –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.