Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemxpert Database

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chemxpert Database

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent WP:PROMO violation. Article contains no third-party sourcing at all; external links provide some third-party interviews but nothing independent of the subject. On running the usual searches, I have not been able to locate anything that is even minimally suggestive of independent coverage in reliable sources, on which an encyclopedic article could be based. So I'm not sure this even meets WP:V, let alone WP:GNG, let alone WP:NCORP. (NB: there is also a "ChemXpert" software product that does not appear to be related to this company, which comes up in some Google Scholar searches.) Visviva (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Uttar Pradesh and Websites. Visviva (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Pretty obvious promotional/advertising article which is just a product a company puts out. Nothing encyclopedic about it. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 08:55, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All extrenal links are removed from article. Pharmadatabase (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless this website becomes notable or is expected to be notable in the near future, I don't see a reason to keeps it. It is far from meeting even the verifiability guideline. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 09:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing independent found. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 11:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All reference sources and external links are updated.All sources links are genuine. Pharmadatabase (talk) 05:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am rather against the deletion of articles on Wikipedia but this is clearly a page used to promote this service, no reliable source found after some research and almost all the sources of the article are primary, I think that the article was even eligible for speedy deletion. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.