Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chesterton High School Football

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Jimfbleak under A7. NAC by—S Marshall T/C 13:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Chesterton High School Football

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability High school sports programs are not automatically notable, although the high schools themselves are. Any sports references should go into an article about the high school itself. Unexplained PROD decline by article creator. Safiel (talk) 00:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nominator to delete. I note that no article exists about the high school itself, and instead recommend writing an article about it, which can briefly mention the football program. Kansan (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable high school football program. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails General Notablity Guideliness and criteria for organisations, groups of people, and clubs, and individually named players fail WP:LISTPEOPLE and Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#High school and pre-high school athletes. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG with no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The article is a gratuitous listing of non-notable alumni, which fails WP:LISTPEOPLE. Also per WP:NONPROFIT, organizations local in scope (i.e. schools) need "substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area." —Bagumba (talk) 06:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. Also no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 11:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it does not meet the WP:GNG (oh and quickly). Mtking (talk) 11:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.