Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chot- Aj Isko, Kal Tereko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chot- Aj Isko, Kal Tereko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film fails notability criteria for filims. The only review I could find was by "Times of India", which is already used as a source in the article.

Also, there is no significant coverage of the film in reliable sources, making it fail general notability guidelines as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the full review in the Times of India is significant coverage in a reliable source, but at least one more national review is needed to pass WP:NFILM or other rs reviews/significant coverage to pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is the debut film of notable model/actress Jesse Randhawa. Undersigned put up few reliable sources of newspaper links like Indian Express and Times of India. Pinakpani (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
even with the newly added sources, it confirms the existence but not notability. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep according to Box Office India it seems to have had a wide release in 2004 so there should be archived reviews offline if not online. As well as the full Times of India review hereI did find this other full review from entertainment magazine gkamsham here and with other coverage it just about passes WP:GNG thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Atlantic306. TOI is a good enough reference and glamsham can also be considered. Considering that the actors are notable (and probably even the director considering he directed a very mainstream movie in Hum Tum Pe Marte Hain and considering he has received press - including a passing mention of the movie in contention in [1]), I think its better to let the article be. Also the fact that the movie is pretty old according to Indian standards and does not have any super stars, there is also the difficulty in finding reliable online sources. Deletion should ideally serve some purpose (weeding out promotion etc), and I am inclined to WP:AGF on this. Jupitus Smart 18:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.