Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Considine
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sue Rodriguez. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chris Considine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable lawyer, with one famous client/case. Sources are all routine mentions of his advocacy, not sigcov of the subject himself. Jdcooper (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Jdcooper (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable career, could redirect to Sue Rodriguez maybe? No sources found that are unrelated to that case. Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons as stated in the nomination, but second @Oaktree b's remark about potential redirect LegalSmeagolian (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rodriguez. One case does not a notable lawyer make. Rhadow (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.