Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris McStay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ . North America1000 07:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris McStay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 02:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:, the "pieces similar to the Daily Record piece" all go into his background and are not the same as the Daily Record piece. Young player with ongoing career. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman:, see my response above, also I have just spent some time doing a WP:HEY and expanded the article with the sources. WP:HEY states that it can be "invoked during deletion discussions to point out that an article has been significantly improved since it was nominated for deletion". Clearly topic of interest in Scotland and Australian football. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 07:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen your response - nothing changes my mind. This is a player who has played in minor leagues in Scotland and Australia and gets minor coverage due to his famous father. That's it. GiantSnowman 08:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed promos, database records, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:
  • Primary, promo, Fails IS RS SIGCOV :: 1.  "New Signing: Chris McStay". Clyde FC. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
  • Routine sports story mentioning they "signed a deal until the end of the season", no SIGCOV :: 2. ^ McDougall, Mark (10 February 2018). "Son of Celtic legend Paul McStay makes Clyde debut after signing deal until end of the season". Daily Record. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
  • Routine sports story mentioning they signed a deal, no SIGCOV :: 3. ^ "WOLVES SIGN SCOTTISH MIDFIELDER". Wollongong Wolves. 6 January 2023. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
  • Father son interview, fails IS RS SIGCOV :: 4. ^ Haggerty, Anthony (22 February 2018). "Sons of Celtic legends McStay and Grant on building their own careers at Clyde". Daily Record.
Above are more of the same, eg: [11], [12] promo interviews; [13], primary promo from club; nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  23:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Still no sources showing notability. More source eval:
Nothing above meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please do a source eval of how your most recent article Serhii Korovayny meets the standards above that you apply to others articles? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:TimothyBlue, can you please not use your personal login information in your Proquest URLs - I've got Proquest open, but your URL still tries to log me in through somewhere in Albany, which Fails. Just trim off the end so you get [14]] or use ProQuest 2022489520. BTW (see below), that looks like a good GNG article to me. Nfitz (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Looking at the Proquest article (ProQuest 2022489520), it doesn't look "routine" to me - meeting GNG. Routine would be a box-score, or a very short mention in a game report. Even an article about a transfer isn't routine; sure they routinely happen, the same way there are routinely articles about big mass-shootings - but that's twisting what's in WP:ROUTINE which talks about "sports scores" and "sports matches"; this is why we don't have an article about every 4-1 result. This December 2022 article is quite good too - ProQuest 2743531727; yeah, it mentions he was transferred; yeah, it's got some quotes from an interview; but it also has more. Nfitz (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.