Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Senn (video game designer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Senn (video game designer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N, not independently notable, and no significant coverage from any reliable source OceanHok (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I know his involvement with Sonic Xtreme is heavily documented in reliable sources in a general sense, but it would take reviewing to verify that the coverage is truly about him - much of it may be more in the context of the game rather than him. Sergecross73 msg me 19:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The current sources in the article are not suitable for establishing notability, and searches did not really turn up any coverage on Senn. There were some books and articles that have quotes from him, in regards to his work on Sonic Xtreme, but like Sergecross73 suggested, this kind of coverage is really on Sonic Xtreme, and not actual coverage about Senn, himself. I also took a quick look around for sources on his current company, Senntertain, and similarly did not find much coverage in reliable sources on it. Rorshacma (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.