Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Tsakis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that insufficient coverage exists in reliable sources to establish the notability of the subject. Mz7 (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Tsakis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(effectively) unreferenced BLP (one primary source at the very end)
created and mainly contributed to by 2 SPAs/COIs
fails WP:GNG Rayman60 (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete radio personaility lacking enough coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. SiriusXM is a national platform, so he would qualify for an article if it could be properly sourced, but it does not constitute an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts him from having to be the subject of enough media coverage to clear WP:GNG. No matter what notability criterion a person is claimed to pass, it's the claim's sourceability that determines whether an article gets to happen or not. Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One would expect someone who is the co-host on SeriusXM to have enough sourcing, but wow, virtually nothing out there on independent reliable sources to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Bearcat. Could possibly be acceptable article if it could be properly sourced (per Bearcat). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.