Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Yarran
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris Yarran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Crystal ball article that fails WP:Athlete - article may be worthy of inclusion after subject has commenced playing in the national league. --VS talk 01:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Although he obviously fails ATHLETE, that's not the only way to become notable: the coverage he's received from these various reliable sources, cited in the article, demonstrates that he's notable enough. Nyttend (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Perhaps squeaks by. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Has sufficient RS to prove notability. The-Pope (talk) 08:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep On precedent. Similar arguments occurred last year and the year before after the draft, and each time the result was keep. Aspirex (talk) 12:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Yarran is a notable football player already with Swan Districts, Article is well written and well referenced.--Hughesdarren (talk) 23:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.