Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas (Jaci Velasquez album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Christmas (Jaci Velasquez album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While I own this album and every other English-language album that this singer has released, this album does not meet notability guidelines listed at WP:NALBUMS, "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Content should be merged into the artist's article or discography. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I wasn't even given a few minutes to add citations after objecting to the prod. I have expanded the article and added citations. Royalbroil 01:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- p.s. Now I cited that it charted on the Billboard 200 and peaked high on the Billboard Top Contemporary Christian album charts. I trust that's enough for a withdrawl or snowball keep? Royalbroil 01:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep: Easily passes WP:NALBUMS if it charted in any sense. Faustus37 (talk) 01:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The article has been updated with references, albeit some are weak. It charted on two Billboard charts: http://www.billboard.com/#/album/jaci-velasquez/christmas/497891 . Too bad I can't request to have the AfD revoked. ---Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You actually can have the Afd speedy closed if you want, would you like to withdraw it? Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.