Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrysler Aspen Hybrid
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy redirected per discussion. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 08:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chrysler Aspen Hybrid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There's no valid reason for a separate article to have been created for this submodel already wholly covered in Chrysler Aspen. Neither article cites any source for the potential release of this model in 2009, and as this model hasn't yet been released, the "2009-present" production date in the infobox makes no sense and the article as a whole borders on speculation. We don't have separate articles for the Chevrolet Caprice and the Chevrolet Caprice Classic and the Chevrolet Caprice Classic LE; this is the same situation. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge andredirect to Chrysler Aspen#Hybrid. Seems to work well for Toyota Highlander Hybrid, for example. Chuck (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Oops, nothing needs merging, as all the info in Chrysler Aspen Hybrid is already also in Chrysler Aspen. Chuck (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Edited to clarify that it should redirect to appropriate section. Chuck (talk) 22:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Chrysler Aspen#Hybrid. This is a trim level of another vehicle and not notable enough to need its own article. Roguegeek (talk) 02:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Chrysler Aspen#Hybrid. Not an unreasonable search term, but the paragraph is covered comfortably in the main article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.