Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuchkana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chuchkana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This article has previously been deleted via PROD and then recently recreated. There are a couple of Raj era sources that seem to refer to the clan but those sources are consistently rejected on the grounds of reliability. I've never been able to find any others that discuss this alleged clan and suspect it is just another Indic last name. Sitush (talk) 08:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not notable and, as written, difficult to know what it's even about. ubiquity (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this unreferenced article. Despite recent events, Sitush is our best and most experienced editor regarding Indian castes and clans. I trust the editor's judgment on this matter. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:52, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.