Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Truly Warped

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Charged GBH. Merge then redirect. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Truly Warped

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:NALBUM ~~with insufficient mention or sourcing available for a suitable redirect/merger with the artist (Charged GBH)~~. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 19:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC); struck/updated 07:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge/redirect to Charged GBH. There's an Allmusic review ([1]), a group review from Record Collector ([2]), and a few other pieces of very brief coverage online ([3], [4], [5], [6]), likely more in print from the time of the album's original release, but as it stands this coverage could perhaps be summarised briefly in the article on the band and this redirected there. Why we would need a quantity of coverage to have a redirect is a mystery to me. --Michig (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michig: Me too. What I meant was that I didn't see enough on the album in the band's article for a redirect to make sense for readers. That said, I see what you mean and would not be opposed to a merge/redirect combo. I have struck that part of the nomination as I no longer agree with it myself. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Charged GBH. I don't see any significant coverage apart from a review in AllMusic. The other review is insignificant and the rest are passing mentions, not enough to satisfy WP:NALBUM. Very little of the content warrants merging since track lists aren't normally given in band's article, and at most a single sentence may be added to the band article. That said, I do realise that it is harder to source information on albums released in that period since many simply aren't archived on the internet making it harder to search. Therefore, keep the edit history, and when more sources are found, the article can be restored and expanded. Hzh (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.