Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cideng, Gambir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cideng, Gambir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stub is basically a mirror of the Wp:id stub http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cideng,_Gambir,_Jakarta_Pusat - it has no evident WP:N, WP:RS or WP:CITE to justify a stub. The higher level article about Gambir should contain the information. Satu Suro 06:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All populated places are notable. Lugnuts (talk) 08:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Automatic notability only applies to census-designated places. The Indonesian census generally goes down to the district (kecamatan) level; an administrative village (lurah) is below that and should not automatically pass WP:N Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a verifiable populated place, which means by long-standing AfD precedent it's considered notable. Contrary to what Crisco said, the precedent doesn't distinguish between census-designated places and other settlements; in fact, many of the AfDs which led to the precedent were about US communities that weren't CDPs. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 07:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - a request for centralising this multiple conversation at Gambir, Gambir - please Satu Suro 08:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are several villages named Cideng near Gambir according to the GEOnet Names Server; no doubt this one is among them and although it would be nice to know which, the absence of precise coordinates is no reason to delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gambir, Jakarta - were this an independent community, it would be a WP:SNOW keep per WP:OUTCOMES. However, it is not - it's a subdivision/neighbourhood of Jakarta, and, as such, should be redirected to the city it is actually part of. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.