Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Dolenc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 01:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Dolenc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biography about someone with essentially no reliable sources available. Catherine Schulz (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: IMDB is a reference that does not permit deletion under BLP:PROD, so should not by itself be a reason for deletion in AfD. So not convinced of lack of notability based on this alone.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 13:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think this person is notable. Just that some more sources are needed to establish that. Debresser (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not convinced of this person's notability. I was not able to find any significant coverage of her, save for this inconequential interview given back in 2003. A Google search turns up some 10,000 hits, but those are mostly listings of her filmography that don't offer any coverage of her at all. Searches on the trade publication Variety and on Entertainment Weekly produced zero results. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read that interview also once. Allow me to ask you. Doesn't 10,000 sites with her filmography spell the word "notable" to you? Debresser (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it doesn't spell "coverage" to me. There are no stories on her, that is the difference. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added a little info. Another three sources. These sources including a small biography and a picture. Debresser (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--per WP:BIO, she "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Looking at her filmography, her roles in Tracker and La Femme Nikita mean she meets this criterion. Meelar (talk) 22:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.