Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citra Indah Residence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. g11 slakr^\ talk / 14:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citra Indah Residence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This reads like an advertisement that has not been fixed or modified in over 6 months - any non advertising tex can be put in the the Ciputra article and this article deleted or made a redirect Satu Suro 12:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, either in the article or elsewhere.. Nothing but spam. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am prepared to withdraw this Afd for an alternative speedy delete - specially as it has been a 9 month free advert Satu Suro 13:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree it should be speedy-deleted, but I see no reason to withdraw this AfD: if the speedy is declined this can go ahead, and if the speedy is accepted this AfD can be speedy-closed. If this is withdrawn and the speedy is declined we waste time having to start another AfD. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reply Thank you for your response I see your point - Satu Suro 13:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.