Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Hall (IRT Second Avenue Line)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. nomination withdrawn. Mgm|^(talk) 13:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

City Hall (IRT Second Avenue Line)

Look at the last discussion on User talk:Chckmtechmp138. 175 of this editors articles have been deleted and the reasons are stated there. I believe this article falls under the same reasoning. Belasted (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:
   :168th Street (BMT Jamaica Line)
   :Sutphin Boulevard (BMT Jamaica Line)
   :Queens Boulevard (BMT Jamaica Line)
   :Metropolitan Avenue (BMT Jamaica Line)

Keep The AfD discussion of these, at WP:Articles for deletion/Court Street (BMT Fulton Street Line), resulted in a snow keep by Tone, followed by renaming of those of the articles that needed it, eg. from 52 Street (BMT Fifth Avenue Line)) to 52nd Street (BMT Fifth Avenue Line). the present AfD therefore does not seem reasonable. DGG (talk) 02:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please be specific in stating deletion rationale. The last discussion that you mentioned now points to a failed deletion request. NVO (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see any valid reason for deletion. --J.Mundo (talk) 05:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was wrong to nominate this. Should I delete this, or just let it stay here? Belasted (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In view of what you say, this debate should now be closed as a speedy keep -- withdrawn by nominator. You could close it yourself as a non-admin closure but I'm not always comfortable with those; I feel it's usually wisest to let the admins be the janitors.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 10:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.