Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Of note is that concerns about promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ClearTax

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for a Non notable website. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is the first India-focused Y Combinator startup which is fairly significant. Notability is also clear with multiple instances of coverage in reliable sources like TechCrunch, NDTV, Times of India, The Economic Times, and similar. Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian has talked about ClearTax on CNBC India. (Trustandhonesty) — Preceding undated comment added 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page cites sources that are legit by wiki standards. As far as tech startups in India go, I think ClearTax is notable enough. Instamojo_Inc. has a page for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.64.21.101 (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the nonsensical 'my competition has an article, why can't I' excuse. Not a valid reason. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Instamojo_Inc. is not a competitor, or a company in the same industry. It is an example of another Indian startup that has a wikipedia page that passes notability & neutrality guidelines. The page is written in a completely neutral way, there is absolutely nothing advertorial or superlative about the copy. There are multiple prominent news articles (Indian and International publications) covering ClearTax. So, according to Wikipedia's own guidelines, ClearTax is notable enough.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:ADMASQ. (Some of these egregious cases could go with speedy tags rather than AfDs.) Pax 21:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The article cites a full story by NDTV and a paragraph in the Times of India, among other sources. Granted, most or all of the coverage seems to be about their connection with YCombinator. Still, WP:CORP requires significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, and the case can be made that they meet that standard. --MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.