Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde, Imperial County, California
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Clyde, Imperial County, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Dunes, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Frink, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Iris, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mesquite, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Pope, Imperial County, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ruthven, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Tortuga, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
To try to save some time, we have a series of sidings/points on the ex-SP line through the desert of California. They all have more or less identical articles, and on the map they all look the same: a rail line (now double-tracked) running along side a road, usually with a distinctive pattern of berms to channel flash flood runoff, and nothing else whatsoever except the desert floor and very spare vegetation. It is hard to imagine that any of these could ever have been settlements. Mangoe (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all of the above: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. // Timothy :: talk
- Delete all - Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom. Checked a couple of them, and yeah, there's nothing notable here. Hog Farm Bacon 06:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all. No post offices. I checked Frink and Ruthven and found only railroad references. No legal recognition, no nontrivial coverage, so WP:GEOLAND is not met. Cxbrx (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all - all fail GEOLAND and GNG Spiderone 10:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all False content, these are not communities. Reywas92Talk 01:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all none of these places meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete ALL: per Spiderone and indiscriminate. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.