Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coby Moscowitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coby Moscowitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:ATHLETE, unscourced bio which would need major cleanup should notability be met. Claiming to to #6 in the world should be notable, given no news about this person it is bordering on hoax. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: doesn't appear to be a complete hoax, there talk of state medals in this, but not enough to get by WP:ATHLETE or GNG. Vrac (talk) 03:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am not taking a position on his notability but this is certainly not a hoax, see here for example. Just Chilling (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't appear to be a hoax, but doesn't appear to meet WP:ATHLETE either, and I'm with Loriendrew, if this person really is ranked 6th in the world, that should be easy to verify, and yet I cannot find any sources that do, only a few mentions on a couple Michigan-specific archery sites, I believe the article is bloated, and there's a good chance of some COI here. War wizard90 (talk) 04:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.