Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that the sources proffered are inadequate to establish notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability except routine funding coverage and paid PR. Ninjaediator (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability. Mccapra (talk) 06:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator Ninjaediator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. However, the nomination has some merit so I will not close this debate. MER-C 18:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from article creator: Not sure if this is the right place for me to put forth my view, I feel this page is notable based on the news article which was published,this company got promising brand of the year award which was published in zimbabwenews as well,could I provide the reliable source to support notabily criteria for the teams perusal Glittershield (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At a deletion discussion please post links to any sources you think support your case. Mccapra (talk) 07:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,The source which I found that supports notability are as follows, In the year 2019 this company got promising brand of the year award by Economic times.

Kindly let me know if I need to provide any more details. Thank youGlittershield (talk) 08:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, awards don't establish notability unfortunately. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly not notable run of the mill startup. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi All, Just not the awards this subject has significant news coverage in independent reliable sources which I found on google, some of the links are mentioned below

Thanks, Glittershield (talk) 17:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your just ref bombing the same exact sources above that already didnt work. Which isn't helpful. Give it up. Seriously. Adamant1 (talk) 21:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glittershield You need to read WP:PAID Yourmasterishere (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first source which I had provided is different from the second one the contents in the article is completely different, I am not trying to promote this company but I do think they are notable. Rest I leave it to the team to decide. Thanks, Glittershield (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glittershield you seem to be engaging into WP:BLUDGEON Yourmasterishere (talk) 04:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Conspicuous case of WP:MILL, nothing notable is being offered by the subject. All refs fail WP:INDEPENDENT & WP:RELIABLE as they are WP:MADEUP, WP:FAKE & WP:HOAX. The subject has entered into what is called as Chain Marketing wherein a customer pays an amount to a main news group which publishes some coverage on the customer and then that coverage is replicated by subsequent "chain" entities which have a tie up arrangement with the main company. This model is resorted to by PR agents to demonstrate that their client has wide coverage across the media which is not the reality. Such kind of absurdity is observable by evaluating the title, date and time of publication and the disclaimers posted. The same has been elaborated below:

^[1], ^[2], ^[3] and ^[4] all have the same title and all were published on January 21, 2020. Their time of publication is further quite close and all state at the end: This story is provided by NewsVoir. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of this article.. The biggest fact to be noted is that In all the refs, exact text has been plainly replicated in verbatim. How can a genuine media output copy something in an exact manner unless there is some commercial aspect?

^[1] even states that: (This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.). Similarly, ^[5] states at the end Disclaimer :- This story has not been edited by Outlook staff and is auto-generated from news agency feeds.

^[6] &^[7] falls into WP:UNENCYC since it does not provide anything encyclopedic and as mentioned above, its just a case of run of the mill. Similarly, ^[8] states one thing about the subject that it raised some funding which does not enable it to continue listing here at WP.

^[9] is on the industry and not on the subject. ^[10] is not at all on the subject and purposely added to influence the consensus. Moreover, in the article, first and third references have been duplicated to increase the number of sources. Crystal case of WP:DNTL

References

Yourmasterishere (talk) 05:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Yourmasterishere, sources are churnalism, fails NCORP. --Goldsztajn (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[BS-1] ttps://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/colive-recognized-as-the-promising-brand-of-the-year-by-economic-times-120012100511_1.html

[2] ttps://www.bignewsnetwork.com/news/263778994/colive-recognized-as-the-promising-brand-of-the-year

[3] ttps://www.zimbabwenews.net/news/263778994/colive-recognized-as-the-promising-brand-of-the-year

[4] ttps://www.aninews.in/news/business/colive-recognized-as-the-promising-brand-of-the-year-by-economic-times20200121131407/

[5] ttps://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/colive-to-expand-in-major-educational-hubs-in-tamil-nadu/1278971

[6] ttps://archive.siasat.com/news/colive-expand-five-cities-2018-aims-market-throughout-south-india-1335209/

[7] ttps://www.hindustantimes.com/real-estate/co-living-apps-take-the-sting-out-of-settling-into-a-new-city/story-qgF2YEqrOxTbjYjKdvFytK.html

[8] ttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/companies/co-living-bucks-realty-slump-as-firms-investors-troop-in/articleshow/72424062.cms

[9] ttps://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/homes-and-gardens/why-the-co-living-segment-is-trending/article26675229.ece

[10] ttps://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/property-/-cstruction/co-living-company-offers-space-to-healthcare-staff/articleshow/75097899.cms

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]