Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The situation hasn't changed much since the last AfD, but the prose is significantly changed enough that this article does not qualify for WP:G4. There is one source that qualifies as in depth, reliable coverage [1]. Everything else included on the page is proof that the musician participated in some event. Might pass WP:MUSICBIO point 12 with this, but it doesn't seem quite substantial. menaechmi (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Hmm, what about FACT, mixmag, Vice, XLR8R, and err... The Clitheroe Advertiser and Times? --Michig (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews, like the one in factmag, aren't independent enough for notability concerns; that Mixmag isn't awful but it doesn't say a lot (it also has an awkward ad in the middle of the page - so I might have missed the second half on my first viewing); the Vice piece is a list of music he likes; XLR8R is a four sentence piece about a new release; and that Clitheroe Advertiser piece is wonderful, and I'm trying to figure out how you found it because even knowing the title of the article I have difficulty finding it. menaechmi (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found from a Google search. --Michig (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet any inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.