Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of church management software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11. Non-admin closure. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of church management software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete Advertising, plain and simple. None of these pieces of software has been found notable enough to warrant having its own article. And if you look at most of the edits to the article they are by editors whose only edits relate to whatever piece of software they want to add to the list (for example: Special:Contributions/Cahabacreek, Special:Contributions/Idefix7, Special:Contributions/Batdude2 and Special:Contributions/Schnieds). Blatant spamming. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:SPAM. archanamiya · talk 00:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising and probably WP:OR by synthesis. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.