Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of the Java and .NET platforms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 10:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of the Java and .NET platforms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is currently a mess and reeks of original research and fancruft. Even if there could be enough sources to justify the notability of this comparison, with the current way this article is written I see no other way than to WP:TNT it. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete - Yes, both the Java, and the .NET platform are similar in many ways; likely they are two very common plaforms where Software development is done. In that respect, the 'recipes' of how certain things are done are very similar; tools may be slightly different. If you look at it at the level of Data Structures (or Abstract Data Tyes), there way to implement Lists, Queues or Sets is similar. I would nevertheless think that doing an in-depth comparison (which needs to be kept up to date, too) shouldn't be the focus of Wikipedia. It will not serve the average reader of wikipedia, and it will be of a very limited use to more tech-savy editors (as they have other sources for this kind of information). Eptalon (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unlikely the comparison could exceed a section in the C# article and this can be revisited if it does. Brandon (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.