Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condemned 84

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus WP:NPASR. ansh 666 07:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Condemned 84

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no sources apart from their own website. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep I've found coverage from 1992 in the Washington Post and a more recent review in a German magazine: [1]. There are a lot of mentions in google book searches too, most of which can't be previewed, but demonstrate that this band has had a lasting influence. By no means brilliant sourcing, but also by no means completely obscure. SmartSE (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. They had both a single and an album on the UK Independent Chart in 1986 - no. 21 and no. 26 respectively (from Barry Lazell's book Indie Hits). It seems likely that print coverage exists from the mid-80s, but none of my books on punk have anything in them about this band. --Michig (talk) 06:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.