Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conlanging - The Art of Crafting Tongues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) f e minist 10:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conlanging - The Art of Crafting Tongues

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a film that does not meet notability. The references in the article do little to establish notability. Most are not independent (film web site, facebook page). The UBC link is just to news postings for the university as one of the people involved is a UBC professor. There is a 660 news item but that is a local Calgary radio station. I searched for coverage and found this news item from a local community news source for the Okanagan. In total, the available resourcing does not establish notability with significant coverage from multiple indpendent reliable sources. Whpq (talk) 01:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as there are the local news sources that seem to be reliable, local news is allowed for WP:GNG but national would be more convincing so putting in a weak keep Atlantic306 (talk) 14:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.