Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Cruise
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 10:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Connor Cruise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Only reasons for notability seem to be inherited or an upcoming film which may or may not be successful. Let's wait for some documented notability please, and FWIW, this is an article about a minor. Rodhullandemu 18:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above, this characterizes it as "very minor role" which doesn't define it as a notable appearance. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER and relations don't confer notability. All WP:RS coverage falls back on the People Magazine story about a bit part in a movie. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relations don't necessarily confer notability, but let's not forget that if he played a major role and the film was succesful, he would be considered notable, not for being related but for the work he did. - Mgm|(talk) 23:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Then WP:CRYSTAL applies. --Rodhullandemu 00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced BLP, also fails the GNG. RMHED (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.