Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conny Harris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conny Harris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN; all but three of the listed sources are to election results. Of the others, one is to the Australian Women's Register, which has entries for every woman who has ever contested a NSW state election; the other two are articles in the local paper in which she is quoted. Further searches on my part have pulled up small amounts of coverage, the usual kind of thing for a local candidate, but nothing that brings her close to WP:GNG. Frickeg (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Frickeg (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She was a deputy mayor of a suburban local council: that's not even a claim of notability, let alone notability, and the sources definitely don't make out any individual notability. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree, even though I'm the author, I guess I had to test the notability of the subject. CLearly doesnt meet the criteria in this case. Siegfried Nugent (talk) 01:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – hesitantly, as Siegfried's done quite a good job with the limited sourcing available, but unsuccessful candidate and suburban councillor just doesn't cut it for notability. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nomination. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.