Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corbin Baldwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corbin Baldwin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. Played just a handful of professional games. Ravenswing 06:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY and I could find no sources that show he meets GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 13:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect to 2013–14 Iowa Wild season. A quick search for sources demonstrates he likely passes GNG. Note: The sheer volume of AfD nominations by this editor (45-plus and counting in the last four days alone) going straight to AfD, without first using PRODs or appropriate tagging, is disruptive. The nom should be reminded that deletion is a last resort, and per WP:BEFORE should only be used after other alternatives, including redirects, have been fully explored. Dolovis (talk) 15:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So provide sources if you think he passes GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. None of the leagues are considered a top professional league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Patken4 (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.