Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corrupt Souls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge Not enough sources for a stand alone article. The common name makes its more difficult to find sources. History preserved if sources are found. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 07:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupt Souls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

musical ensemble that fails all 12 elements of WP:BAND. While they've released material on Moving Shadow, #5 requires 2 or more albums - which they do not have. Alvarado may be notable on his own, but clark is not, failing #6. The Dissident Aggressor 06:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My searches clearly found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Alvin Risk. Doesn't merit a standalone article but should be covered in the article on the notable member. A source that can be cited to confirm basic facts: [1]. --Michig (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.