Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cray cray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cray cray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 03:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to make people popular.Smoshfan17 (talk) 03:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 03:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - total nonsense. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - although I've heard the term before, it's more slang than a phrase, and Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. -Fimatic ^{(talk | contribs)} 04:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't see any category of speedy delete that would apply. WP:G1 (nonsense) doesn't apply because the content is comprehensible. It's not clear vandalism either. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 04:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tchaliburton, I think in this case the admin's would understand your reasoning for using nonsense, no context, or vandalism. Even if it doesn't fit perfectly, it's pretty clear.War wizard90 (talk) 05:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - would have tagged this for speedy delete rather than afd myself. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and definitely not an urban dictionary.War wizard90 (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW delete as a dictionary entry. I notice that Wiktionary already has the term: wikt:cray-cray. —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unencyclopedic WP:DICDEF containing nothing worth keeping. However, Wikipedia has many articles on recent slang terms, and when sufficient sources are found to demonstrate mere usage, they increasingly tend to survive AfD. A passably encyclopedic article could probably be written on this term. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.