Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creatity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Creatity

~~Article about a non-notable website masquerading as a dicdef.~~ Stifle (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete it's not even a dict-def, the page admits it's a made up name. ~~It's an advert pure and simple.~~ OK the advertising link has gone, it's still a made up word which google results show to be a common mispelling rather than anything notable --Blowdart | ^talk 12:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many pages in the net using this word. Somehow I cannot believe that all these occurrences are just type mistakes.

It looks to be used more in the EU or in India etc.

[1]

[2]

[3]

BTW. maybe you can explain me this one "Creatity–Not for creativity sake"

I understand that what is not in google does not exist, but if you take a look better you will see many articles with this word.

You can dig it up also in www.baidu.com , altavista, lycos, excite ...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abuelow (talk • contribs) 14:00, February 13, 2009

Delete Per WP:NEO. Extensive use of a neologism does not mean it is notable, notability for a neologism is established by multiple, third party and significant coverage, not by wide-spread use. I do not see any evidence of this neologism being notable by Wikipedia standards and therefore it should be deleted. The Seeker 4 Talk 15:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable neologism. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ditto, non-notable neologism and stealth spam. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a nonnotable neologism. MuZemike 18:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NEO. Tractops (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.