Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crombulent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uncommon misspelling of "cromulent". Google gives over 200,000 hits for "cromulent", while "crombulent" gets just 17 hits and the question "Did you mean: cromulent?" Robert Happelberg 16:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously. -- Scientizzle 16:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Very little here to discuss. --Fuhghettaboutit 16:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Article fails to embiggen Wikipedia. ScottW 17:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh. Embiggen. Very nice. -- Scientizzle 17:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Though it might be worth noting in Wiktionary in relation to correct spelling. Cromulent Kwyjibo 22:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not only is it inaccurate in its Simpsons reference, but also, I think, in its Blackadder reference - I'm fairly sure it's never appeared in the latter word. I would assume the editor is thinking of the made-up words used by Edmund in Ink and Incapability - but I really don't think it's one of them. No reason whatsoever, therefore, for the article to exist on WP. Seb Patrick 08:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cromulent as possible mis-spelling. MLA 12:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.