Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross the Styx
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cross the Styx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no individual notability shown for this album. lacks charting, awards, coverage. nothing satisfying WP:NALBUMS. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following other album pages by the same band:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Wikipedia doesn't need album pages that will perpetually consist of only a track listing. A lack of notability or reliable sources locks this into a state of eternal uselessness. i kan reed (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.